Cognition élargie, systèmes dynamiques complexes et prise de décision dans le sport
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5016/bjsphd.v1i3.19824Mots-clés :
Cognition étendue ; Sport ; Systèmes dynamiques complexes ; Prise de décision ; Régulation cognitiveRésumé
La compréhension de la cognition dans le sport a connu une transformation significative ces dernières décennies, passant de modèles internalistes, fondés sur le traitement de l'information, à des perspectives plus larges reconnaissant le rôle constitutif de l'environnement, du corps et des outils matériels et sociaux dans le fonctionnement cognitif. Le concept de cognition élargie, articulé avec les théories des systèmes dynamiques complexes et les approches énactives et écologiques, offre un cadre théorique solide pour comprendre l'action et la prise de décision dans des contextes très complexes, tels que le sport. Cet article vise à examiner en profondeur les fondements théoriques et épistémologiques de la cognition élargie appliquée au sport, en mettant l'accent sur son interface avec les systèmes dynamiques, la cognition, la métacognition et la régulation. Les implications de la métacognition en tant que mécanisme de surveillance et de contrôle adaptatifs sont discutées, ainsi que son articulation avec les régimes de stabilité et de métastabilité dans les systèmes non linéaires. L'objectif est de fournir une base conceptuelle solide pour intégrer la cognition élargie, la dynamique complexe et les processus de régulation, préparant ainsi le terrain pour l'analyse ultérieure des dimensions émotionnelles et décisionnelles qui seront explorées plus en détail dans la seconde partie de ce travail.
Références
ADOLPHS, R. The biology of fear. Current Biology, v. 23, n. 2, p. R79-R93, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.055.
ARAÚJO, D. et al. Ecological cognition: Expert decision-making behavior in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-25, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1349826.
ARAÚJO, D.; DAVIDS, K.; HRISTOVSKI, R. The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, v. 7, n. 6, p. 653-676, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.07.002.
BALAGUÉ, N.; TORRENTS, C.; HRISTOVSKI, R.; DAVIDS, K.; ARAÚJO, D. Overview of complex systems in sport. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, v. 26, p. 4-13, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-013-2285-0.
BARRETT, L. F. How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2018.
BARSALOU, L. W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 59, p. 617-645, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
BARSALOU, L. W. Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, v. 2, n. 4, p. 716-724, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x.
CAPPUCCIO, M. L. Introduction: When embodied cognition and sport psychology team-up. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, v. 14, p. 213-225, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9415-1.
CLARK, A. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
CLARK, A. Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
CLARK, A.; CHALMERS, D. J. The extended mind. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, p. 7-19, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7.
CSURILLA, G.; STERBENZ, T. The presence of uncertainty in sport—A literature review. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai, Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, v. 67, n. 1, p. 19-30, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.67(1).02.
DIAMOND, A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 64, p. 135-168, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
DUNLOSKY, J.; METCALFE, J. Metacognition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009.
FAJEN, B.; RILEY, M.; TURVEY, M. T. Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, v. 40, n. 1, p. 79-107, 2009.
FARINA, M. Embodied cognition: Dimensions, domains and applications. Adaptive Behavior, v. 29, n. 1, p. 73-88, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712320912963.
FLAVELL, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, v. 34, n. 10, p. 906-911, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
FLEMING, S. M.; DOLAN, R. J. The neural basis of metacognitive ability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, v. 367, n. 1594, p. 1338-1349, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0417.
GALLAGHER, S. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
GIBSON, J. J. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
GIGERENZER, G.; GAISSMAIER, W. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 62, p. 451-482, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.
GOLD, J. I.; SHADLEN, M. N. The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, v. 30, p. 535-574, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038.
GOTTMAN, J. M.; KATZ, L. F.; HOOVER, C. Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
GROSS, J. J. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 271-299, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.
GROSS, J. J.; THOMPSON, R. A. Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In: GROSS, J. J. (org.). Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford, 2007. p. 3-24.
HANIN, Y. L. Emotions in sport: Current issues and perspectives. In: TENENBAUM, G.; EKLUND, R. C. (org.). Handbook of sport psychology. 3. ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2007. p. 31-58.
HUTCHINS, E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
JUARRERO, A. Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
KELSO, J. A. S. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
KELSO, J. A.; TOGNOLI, E. Toward a complementary neuroscience: Metastable coordination dynamics of the brain. Chaos and Complexity Letters, v. 1, p. 141-162, 2017.
LANE, A. M. et al. Instrumental emotion regulation in sport: Relationships between beliefs about emotion and emotion regulation strategies used by athletes. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, v. 21, n. 6, p. e445-e451, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01364.x.
MIYAKE, A. et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks. Cognitive Psychology, v. 41, n. 1, p. 49-100, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
NELSON, T. O. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In: BESSON, T. (org.). Psychology of learning and motivation. Cambridge: Academic Press, 1990. p. 125-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5.
NOË, A. Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
PESSOA, L. The cognitive-emotional brain: From interactions to integration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.
PESSOA, L. The entangled brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022.
PEZZULO, G.; CISEK, P. Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 20, n. 6, p. 414-424, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013.
RAAB, M. Simple heuristics in sports. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 5, n. 2, p. 104-120, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2012.654810.
RAAB, M.; ARAÚJO, D. Embodied cognition with and without mental representations: The case of embodied choices in sports. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 10, art. 1825, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01825.
RAAB, M.; GIGERENZER, G. Intelligence as smart heuristics. In: TENENBAUM, G.; EKLUND, R. C. (org.). Handbook of sport psychology. 3. ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2007. p. 558-575.
RILEY, M. A.; TURVEY, M. T. Variability and determinism in motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, v. 34, n. 2, p. 99-125, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890209601934.
SHADLEN, M. N.; KIANI, R. Decision making as a window on cognition. Neuron, v. 80, n. 3, p. 791-806, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.047.
SMITH, P. L.; RATCLIFF, R. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences, v. 27, n. 3, p. 161-168, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.01.006.
SPIVEY, M. J. The continuity of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
SUTTON, J.; HARRIS, C. B.; KEIL, P. G.; BARNIER, A. J. The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, v. 9, p. 521-560, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9182-y.
THELEN, E.; SMITH, L. B. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
TOGNOLI, E.; KELSO, J. A. S. The metastable brain. Neuron, v. 81, n. 1, p. 35-48, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022.
VARELA, F. J.; THOMPSON, E.; ROSCH, E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.
VOIGT, L. et al. Advancing judgment and decision-making research in sport psychology by using the body as an informant in embodied choices. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 3, n. 1, p. 47-56, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.09.006.
WILLEMS, R. M.; FRANCKEN, J. C. Embodied cognition: Taking the next step. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 3, art. 582, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00582.
WILSON, A. D.; GOLONKA, S. Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 4, art. 58, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058.
WILSON, M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 9, n. 4, p. 625-636, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322.
WITHAGEN, R.; DE POOLE, I.; ARAÚJO, D.; PEPPING, G.-J. Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, v. 30, n. 2, p. 250-258, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003.
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (BJSPHD) 2025
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
